Martin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Martin v. State

503 S.W.3d 304, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1135, 2016 WL 6596063

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 8, 2016

DocketNo. ED 104036

StatusPublished

This text of 503 S.W.3d 304 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. State, 503 S.W.3d 304, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1135, 2016 WL 6596063 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Freddie Martin (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted, following a jury trial, of the class A felony of second-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.021, RSMo. 2000, and the unclassified felony of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. Movant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender pursuant to Section 558.016, RSMo. Cum. Supp. 2008, to current terms of life imprisonment, with one life term for each of the two counts. This Court affirmed his convictions and sentences in State v. Freddie Martin, 362 S.W.3d 488 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012). We affirm the motion court’s judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Freddie Martin (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted, following a jury trial, of the class A felony of second-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.021, RSMo. 2000, and the unclassified felony of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. Movant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender pursuant to Section 558.016, RSMo. Cum. Supp. 2008, to current terms of life imprisonment, with one life term for each of the two counts. This Court affirmed his convictions and sentences in State v. Freddie Martin, 362 S.W.3d 488 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012). We affirm the motion court’s judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

503 S.W.3d 304, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1135, 2016 WL 6596063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-moctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack