Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Martin v. State

Martin v. State

185 So. 3d 621, 2016 WL 424607
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2960 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 2016·No. No. 4D15-1625·Published

Opinion

[622]*622 ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant in part the appellant’s motion for rehearing, but only to clarify that the defendant’s appeal is from the denial of both his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion and his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. We otherwise deny the appellant’s motion for rehearing in all other respects, and thereby maintain our affirmance of the defendant’s appeal on the merits. See Martinez v. State, 169 So.3d 170 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, C.J., MAY and GERBER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 185 So. 3d 621, 2016 WL 424607 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

185 So. 3d 621 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jose Martinez v. State of Florida
169 So. 3d 170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)