Martin v. State
152 So. 3d 95, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19137, 2014 WL 6488729
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 21, 2014·No. No. 5D14-1628·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the denial of Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief, except as it relates to the severance claim raised in paragraph eight of the motion, which was not addressed by the trial court. We remand for the trial court to either attach portions of the record that refute those allegations, or set an evidentiary hearing.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. State, 152 So. 3d 95, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19137, 2014 WL 6488729 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
152 So. 3d 95 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. State
159 So. 3d 382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)