Martin v. State
84 So. 3d 1236, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5642, 2012 WL 1231031
Opinion
We affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences on Count I (robbery with a firearm) and Count II (aggravated battery with a firearm), but reverse the conviction and sentence on Count III (aggravated battery with a baseball bat) based on double jeopardy grounds.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. State, 84 So. 3d 1236, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5642, 2012 WL 1231031 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
84 So. 3d 1236 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.