Martin v. State

135 So. 3d 1135, 2014 WL 1393077, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5317
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5553
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 2014·No. No. 5D12-2747·Published

Opinion

PALMER, J.

James V. Martin timely appeals his judgment and sentences, entered by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of attempted second degree murder and aggravated battery. We conclude that there [1136]*1136is no reversible error with regard to those convictions and sentences; therefore, we affirm same. However, the written judgment erroneously included a conviction for attempted voluntary manslaughter, even though that conviction had been dismissed by the trial court on double jeopardy grounds. The State properly concedes error.

Accordingly, we affirm the defendant’s judgment and sentences for attempted second degree murder and aggravated battery, but remand for correction of the written judgment to reflect the dismissal of the attempted first degree murder conviction.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of judgment.

EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 135 So. 3d 1135, 2014 WL 1393077, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5317 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

135 So. 3d 1135 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.