Martin v. State
941 So. 2d 1173, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16589, 2006 WL 2844438
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 2006·No. No. 5D06-2584·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850 because the motion was brought more than two years after appellant’s judgment and sentence became final. The filing of an unsuccessful petition for belated appeal does not toll the rendition of a judgment and sentence for purposes of calculating the two-year window. See Jones v. State, 922 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. State, 941 So. 2d 1173, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16589, 2006 WL 2844438 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
941 So. 2d 1173 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Huey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections(Polk County)
M.D. Florida, 2025
Rogers v. State
146 So. 3d 1263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Kranias v. Tsiogas
941 So. 2d 1173 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)