Martin v. State
This text of 864 So. 2d 589 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Warren R. MARTIN, Jr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Thomas J. Lukashow, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm. See Miller v. State, 861 So.2d 1283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). As we did in Miller, we certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.
SHARP, W., MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
864 So. 2d 589, 2004 WL 220864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.