Martin v. State
864 So. 2d 589, 2004 WL 220864
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 6, 2004·No. 5D03-1322·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
Warren R. MARTIN, Jr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Thomas J. Lukashow, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm. See Miller v. State, 861 So.2d 1283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). As we did in Miller, we certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.
SHARP, W., MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. State, 864 So. 2d 589, 2004 WL 220864 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
864 So. 2d 589 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Subido
925 So. 2d 1052 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Newingham v. State
881 So. 2d 83 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Sigler v. State
877 So. 2d 858 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Johnson v. State
875 So. 2d 1281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Wattles v. State
875 So. 2d 794 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Valentin v. State
874 So. 2d 1280 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Springer v. State
874 So. 2d 719 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Rickman v. State
871 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Demick v. State
871 So. 2d 1010 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Hannah v. State
869 So. 2d 692 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)