Demick v. State
This text of 871 So. 2d 1010 (Demick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As we have held before, the Florida Sexual Predators Act, does not deny procedural due process under the Florida Constitution. White v. State, 866 So.2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 715 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). See also Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Martin v. State, 864 So.2d 589, 589 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Givens v. State, 851 So.2d 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the order denying relief. Again, we certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
871 So. 2d 1010, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5485, 2004 WL 840207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demick-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.