Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Demick v. State

Demick v. State

871 So. 2d 1010, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5485, 2004 WL 840207
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 21, 2004·No. No. 4D04-977·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As we have held before, the Florida Sexual Predators Act, does not deny procedural due process under the Florida Constitution. White v. State, 866 So.2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 715 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). See also Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Martin v. State, 864 So.2d 589, 589 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Givens v. State, 851 So.2d 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the order denying relief. Again, we certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

FARMER, C.J., GUNTHER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Demick v. State, 871 So. 2d 1010, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5485, 2004 WL 840207 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

871 So. 2d 1010 (Demick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. State
866 So. 2d 703 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Therrien v. State
859 So. 2d 585 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Givens v. State
851 So. 2d 813 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Martin v. State
864 So. 2d 589 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Reyes v. State
854 So. 2d 816 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Jones v. State
855 So. 2d 715 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Espindola v. State
855 So. 2d 1281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)