White v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

White v. State

866 So. 2d 703, 2003 WL 22399730

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 4, 2004

Docket4D02-2320

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 866 So. 2d 703 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. State, 866 So. 2d 703, 2003 WL 22399730 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

866 So.2d 703 (2003)

Anthony J. WHITE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D02-2320.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 22, 2003. Order Granting Certification January 4, 2004.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sue-Ellen Kenny, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals an order that rejected his argument that section 775.21(6), Fla. Stat. (2001), "The Florida Sexual Predators Act," is unconstitutional and declared him to be a sexual predator. He argues that the trial court erred in its declaration because the statute fails to afford him procedural due process and impermissibly intrudes on his privacy interests. This court has recently resolved those issues contrary to the defendant's position. See Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). We therefore affirm.

WARNER, MAY, JJ., and ARAMONY, SUSAN, Assoc. Judge, concur.

704 ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION*

We grant the defendant's motion for certification. We certify that this decision directly and expressly conflicts with the Third District Court of Appeal's decision in Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) on the issue of the constitutionality of the Florida Sexual Predators Act (FSPA).

WARNER, MAY, JJ., and ARAMONY, SUSAN, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

866 So.2d 703 (2003)

Anthony J. WHITE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D02-2320.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 22, 2003. Order Granting Certification January 4, 2004.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sue-Ellen Kenny, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals an order that rejected his argument that section 775.21(6), Fla. Stat. (2001), "The Florida Sexual Predators Act," is unconstitutional and declared him to be a sexual predator. He argues that the trial court erred in its declaration because the statute fails to afford him procedural due process and impermissibly intrudes on his privacy interests. This court has recently resolved those issues contrary to the defendant's position. See Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). We therefore affirm.

WARNER, MAY, JJ., and ARAMONY, SUSAN, Assoc. Judge, concur.

704 ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION*

We grant the defendant's motion for certification. We certify that this decision directly and expressly conflicts with the Third District Court of Appeal's decision in Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) on the issue of the constitutionality of the Florida Sexual Predators Act (FSPA).

WARNER, MAY, JJ., and ARAMONY, SUSAN, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

866 So. 2d 703, 2003 WL 22399730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Anthony J. WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

*704 ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Anthony J. WHITE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

704 ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION*