Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Martin v. State

Martin v. State

894 So. 2d 307, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2018, 2005 WL 418704
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 864 So. 2d 589 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 23, 2005·No. No. 3D05-216·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 894 So. 2d 307, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2018, 2005 WL 418704 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

894 So. 2d 307 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooper v. State
817 So. 2d 934 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)