Martin v. State

326 So. 2d 248
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 323 So. 2d 666
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 1976·No. No. 75-1566·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as, counsel for the indigent defendants-appellants, and having furnished appellants with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellants a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that they chose in support of this appeal, and the appellants having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 326 So. 2d 248 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

326 So. 2d 248 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)