Martin v. State

312 So. 2d 525, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14997
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 294 So. 2d 414
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 14, 1975·No. No. V-53·Published

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Defendant-appellant was charged with aggravated assault and convicted of assault and battery. Defendant requested the trial court to give standard jury instruction 2.05 (aggravated assault) but the trial court refused. Instead, the trial court gave its own instruction on aggravated assault from which it omitted the element of “well founded fear of violence being done”.

The trial court erred in refusing to give the requested standard instruction. White v. State, 299 So.2d 143 (Fla.App. 1974). However, as the defendant was found guilty of the lesser included offense of assault and battery, the error was harmless, Section 924.33, Florida Statutes.

The other point on appeal has been considered but is found to be without merit.

Affirmed.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and McCORD, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 312 So. 2d 525, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14997 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

312 So. 2d 525 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. State
299 So. 2d 143 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)