Martin v. State
This text of 294 So. 2d 414 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rayfield MARTIN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Bruce J. Daniels, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Basil S. Diamond, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
COWART, JOE A., Jr., Associate Judge.
In reinstructing the jury at their request, the trial judge defined manslaughter (F.S. Section 782.07, F.S.A.), but failed to define excusable homicide (F.S. Section 782.03, F.S.A.), and refused to repeat a substitute "accidental" instruction requested by defense counsel.
Hedges v. State, Fla.S.Ct. 1965, 172 So.2d 824; Green v. State, Fla.App. 1971, 244 So.2d 167; and Stills v. State (1 DCA 1973), 272 So.2d 174, are in point and require that the judgment herein be, and it is hereby, reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
WALDEN and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
294 So. 2d 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-fladistctapp-1974.