Marine Towing & Salvage of S.W. FL., Inc. v. One 66' 2019 Sabre Dirigo
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
MARINE TOWING & SALVAGE OF S.W. FL., INC.,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No.: 2:22-cv-346-SPC-KCD
ONE 66’ 2019 SABRE DIRIGO, MONTE BRIGGS, and EYRIE HOLDINGS, LLC,
Defendants. /
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (Doc. 110), Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. 114), and United States Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 116). Judge Dudek recommends that Defendants’ motion be granted in part and denied in part. No party objected, so the matter is ripe for review. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,” a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). In the absence of a specific objection, there is no requirement that a district judge review a report and recommendation de novo. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). Instead, when parties don’t object, a district court need only correct plain error as demanded by the interests of justice. See, e.g., Symonette v. V.A. Leasing Corp., 648 F.
App’x 787, 790 (11th Cir. 2016); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-52 (1985). Plain error exists if (1) “an error occurred”; (2) “the error was plain”; (3) “it affected substantial rights”; and (4) “not correcting the error would seriously affect the fairness of the judicial proceedings.” Farley v. Nationwide Mut.
Ins., 197 F.3d 1322, 1329 (11th Cir. 1999). After careful consideration and an independent review of the case, the Court finds no plain error. It accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation in full.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. Judge Dudek’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 116) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, and the findings incorporated
herein. 2. Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (Doc. 110) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
a. The Court awards $234,648.05 in attorney’s fees; b. The Court awards $30,679.53 in costs; and c. The Clerk is DIRECTED to amend the judgment to include these figures. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on February 24, 2025.
, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marine Towing & Salvage of S.W. FL., Inc. v. One 66' 2019 Sabre Dirigo (Marine Towing & Salvage of S.W. FL., Inc. v. One 66' 2019 Sabre Dirigo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.