Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. Hemcon, Inc.
This text of 475 F. App'x 315 (Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. Hemcon, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc was filed by Plaintiff-Appellee and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by Defendant-Appellant. The court granted leave to Intellectual Ventures Management LLC and Jan K. Voda, M.D. to file separate briefs amicus curiae.
The petition for rehearing was considered by the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc, response, and briefs amicus curiae were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll of whether to rehear the appeal en banc. ** A poll was requested, taken, and the court has decided that the appeal warrants en banc consideration.
Upon consideration thereof,
It Is Ordered That:
(1) The petition of Plaintiff-Appellee for panel rehearing is denied.
(2) The petition of Plaintiff-Appellee for rehearing en banc is granted.
(3) The court’s opinion of September 26, 2011 is vacated, and the appeal is reinstated.
(4) This appeal will be heard en banc on the basis of the originally filed briefs. No additional briefing or oral argument will be requested.
Judge O'Malley did not participate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
475 F. App'x 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marine-polymer-technologies-inc-v-hemcon-inc-cafc-2012.