Marin v. Johnson

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 || HAROLD MARIN, Case No. 2:22-cv-00862-GMN-EJY 6 Petitioner, 7 v. ORDER

BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al.,

9 Respondents. 10 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Harold Marin’s 11 || unopposed fourth Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED. The Court finds 12 || the motion is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay. Marin has until August 13 || 14, 2023, to file a second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus.! 14 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 15 1. Petitioner Harold Marin’s unopposed fourth Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 16 23) is granted. 17 DATED: July 10, 2023 18 19 M. NAVARRO 0 UNI) STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 □ ' Petitioner at all times remains responsible for calculating the running of the federal limitation 26 period and timely presenting claims. That is, by setting a deadline to amend the petition and/or by granting any extension thereof, the Court makes no finding or representation that the petition, 27 any amendments thereto, and/or any claims contained therein are not subject to dismissal as 28 untimely. See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1235 (9th Cir. 2013).