Marin v. Johnson

Opinion

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5 HAROLD MARIN, Case No. 2:22-cv-00862-GMN-EJY

6 Petitioner, v. ORDER 7 BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., 8 Respondents. 9 10 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Harold Marin’s 11 unopposed third Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED. The Court finds the 12 motion is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay. Marin has until June 13, 13 2023, to file a second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus.1 14 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 15 1. Petitioner Harold Marin’s unopposed third Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 21) 16 is granted.

17 DATED: April 19, 2023

18 ________________________________ 19 GLORIA M. NAVARRO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 Petitioner at all times remains responsible for calculating the running of the federal limitation 26 period and timely presenting claims. That is, by setting a deadline to amend the petition and/or by granting any extension thereof, the Court makes no finding or representation that the petition, any 27 amendments thereto, and/or any claims contained therein are not subject to dismissal as untimely. See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1235 (9th Cir. 2013). 28