Maradriaga v. 7-ELEVEN

29 So. 3d 440, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2927, 2010 WL 796364
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 10, 2010
Docket1D09-6394
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 So. 3d 440 (Maradriaga v. 7-ELEVEN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maradriaga v. 7-ELEVEN, 29 So. 3d 440, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2927, 2010 WL 796364 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s response to this Court’s show cause order entered January 12, 2010, we GRANT Appellees’ motion to dismiss and DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). See also Fla. Retail Fed’n Self-Insured, Fund v. Quintero, 909 So.2d 332, 333 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

LEWIS, THOMAS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maradriaga v. 7-ELEVEN
35 So. 3d 109 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 So. 3d 440, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2927, 2010 WL 796364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maradriaga-v-7-eleven-fladistctapp-2010.