Boladares v. Olemshoe Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Boladares v. Olemshoe Corp.

28 So. 3d 176, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1424, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 381

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 12, 2010

Docket1D09-5486

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 28 So. 3d 176 (Boladares v. Olemshoe Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boladares v. Olemshoe Corp., 28 So. 3d 176, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1424, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 381 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s response to this court’s January 19, 2010, order to show cause, we DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding order merely granting employer/carrier’s motion to dismiss not an appealable final order); Truc v. Kimmins Corp., 889 So.2d 964, 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (dismissing appeal of order granting employer/carrier’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Mintz); see also, Dedge v. Crosby, 914 So.2d 1055, 1056 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (order granting motion to dismiss with prejudice no more final than order granting motion to dismiss without prejudice). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

LEWIS, THOMAS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s response to this court’s January 19, 2010, order to show cause, we DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding order merely granting employer/carrier’s motion to dismiss not an appealable final order); Truc v. Kimmins Corp., 889 So.2d 964, 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (dismissing appeal of order granting employer/carrier’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Mintz); see also, Dedge v. Crosby, 914 So.2d 1055, 1056 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (order granting motion to dismiss with prejudice no more final than order granting motion to dismiss without prejudice). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

LEWIS, THOMAS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 So. 3d 176, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1424, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boladares-v-olemshoe-corp-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack