Fountain v. PMI Employee Leasing

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fountain v. PMI Employee Leasing

77 So. 3d 252, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 369, 2012 WL 130584

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 18, 2012·No. No. 1D11-6037·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s timely response to this court’s November 15, 2011, order to show cause, we DISMISS this appeal without prejudice to the right to seek review upon entry of a final order. See Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding order merely granting employer/earrier’s motion to dismiss is not an appealable final order); see also, e.g., Skoran v. Seacoast Util. Auth., 60 So.3d 1174 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Boladares v. Olemshoe Corp., 28 So.3d 176 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Truc v. Kimmins Corp., 889 So.2d 964, 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

DISMISSED.

WETHERELL, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s timely response to this court’s November 15, 2011, order to show cause, we DISMISS this appeal without prejudice to the right to seek review upon entry of a final order. See Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding order merely granting employer/earrier’s motion to dismiss is not an appealable final order); see also, e.g., Skoran v. Seacoast Util. Auth., 60 So.3d 1174 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Boladares v. Olemshoe Corp., 28 So.3d 176 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Truc v. Kimmins Corp., 889 So.2d 964, 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

DISMISSED.

WETHERELL, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Fountain v. PMI Employee Leasing, 77 So. 3d 252, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 369, 2012 WL 130584 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

77 So. 3d 252 (Fountain v. PMI Employee Leasing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related