Fountain v. PMI Employee Leasing

77 So. 3d 252, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 369, 2012 WL 130584
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 18, 2012
DocketNo. 1D11-6037
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 77 So. 3d 252 (Fountain v. PMI Employee Leasing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fountain v. PMI Employee Leasing, 77 So. 3d 252, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 369, 2012 WL 130584 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s timely response to this court’s November 15, 2011, order to show cause, we DISMISS this appeal without prejudice to the right to seek review upon entry of a final order. See Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding order merely granting employer/earrier’s motion to dismiss is not an appealable final order); see also, e.g., Skoran v. Seacoast Util. Auth., 60 So.3d 1174 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Boladares v. Olemshoe Corp., 28 So.3d 176 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Truc v. Kimmins Corp., 889 So.2d 964, 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

DISMISSED.

WETHERELL, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Broadnax v. State
77 So. 3d 252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 So. 3d 252, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 369, 2012 WL 130584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fountain-v-pmi-employee-leasing-fladistctapp-2012.