Skoran v. Seacoast Utility Authority

60 So. 3d 1174, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7240, 2011 WL 1885325
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 2011·No. No. 1D11-0946·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s response to this court’s March 1, 2011, order to show cause, we DISMISS this appeal and cross-appeal without prejudice to the right to seek review upon entry of a final order. See Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding order merely granting employer/earrier’s motion to dismiss is not an appealable final order); Truc v. Kimmins Corp., 889 So.2d 964, 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (dismissing, pursuant to Mintz, appeal of order granting employer/carrier’s motion to dismiss); see also Dedge v. Crosby, 914 So.2d 1055, 1056 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (order granting motion to dismiss with prejudice no more final than order granting motion to dismiss without prejudice).

DISMISSED.

BENTON, C.J., WEBSTER, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Skoran v. Seacoast Utility Authority, 60 So. 3d 1174, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7240, 2011 WL 1885325 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

60 So. 3d 1174 (Skoran v. Seacoast Utility Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fountain v. PMI Employee Leasing
77 So. 3d 252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)