Maradriaga v. 7-ELEVEN

29 So. 3d 440, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2927, 2010 WL 796364
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 10, 2010·No. 1D09-6394·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s response to this Court’s show cause order entered January 12, 2010, we GRANT Appellees’ motion to dismiss and DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). See also Fla. Retail Fed’n Self-Insured, Fund v. Quintero, 909 So.2d 332, 333 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

LEWIS, THOMAS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maradriaga v. 7-ELEVEN, 29 So. 3d 440, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2927, 2010 WL 796364 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

29 So. 3d 440 (Maradriaga v. 7-ELEVEN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maradriaga v. 7-ELEVEN
35 So. 3d 109 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)