Manuel v. The State of New York

Opinion

poo “4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ony □□□ □ ee ee ee ne eee ne eee □□ RAR ONTCALELY | □□ □□□□ □ ELIZABETH MANUEL, : DOC He Plaintiff, : | DATE Fil / 7: □□ □ : ORDER THE STATE OF NEW YORK; KENNETH 18 CV 11820 (VB) MAINE, Correction Officer; and ANTHONY LORENZO, Correction Officer, Defendants, a en ee et □ tN On December 13, 2019, defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. (Doc. #15). Plaintiff's opposition to the motion was thus due December 30, 2019. See Local Rule 6.1(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). To date, plaintiff has failed to oppose the motion or seek an extension of time in which to do so. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED: l, The Court sua sponte extends plaintiff's time to oppose the motion to February 6, 2020. Defendants’ reply, if any, is due February 13, 2020. 2. If plaintiff fails to respond to the motion by February 6, 2020, the motion will be deemed fully submitted and unopposed. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Dated: January 7, 2020 White Plains, NY Vand | Alle Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge