Manolakos v. Manolakos

435 N.E.2d 678, 56 N.Y.2d 591, 450 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3268
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 30, 1982·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness of the motion as required by rule 500.9 (a) (1) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.9 [a] [1]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manolakos v. Manolakos, 435 N.E.2d 678, 56 N.Y.2d 591, 450 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3268 (N.Y. 1982).

435 N.E.2d 678 (Manolakos v. Manolakos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Romano
462 N.E.2d 151 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Patsy Bello Nurseries, Inc. v. City of New York
459 N.E.2d 193 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Poitier v. Fimag Realty Corp.
445 N.E.2d 208 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)