In re the Estate of Romano
462 N.E.2d 151, 61 N.Y.2d 833, 473 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4095
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate the timeliness of the motion as required by rule 500.11 (d) (1) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1]) (see Manolakos v Manolakos, 56 NY2d 591).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Estate of Romano, 462 N.E.2d 151, 61 N.Y.2d 833, 473 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4095 (N.Y. 1984).
462 N.E.2d 151 (In re the Estate of Romano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manolakos v. Manolakos
435 N.E.2d 678 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)