Poitier v. Fimag Realty Corp.
445 N.E.2d 208, 58 N.Y.2d 748, 459 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3948
This text of 445 N.E.2d 208 (Poitier v. Fimag Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Poitier v. Fimag Realty Corp., 445 N.E.2d 208, 58 N.Y.2d 748, 459 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3948 (N.Y. 1982).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness of the motion as required by rule 500.9 (a) (1) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.9 [c] [1]) (see Manolakos v Manolakos, 56 NY2d 591).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Manolakos v. Manolakos
435 N.E.2d 678 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
445 N.E.2d 208, 58 N.Y.2d 748, 459 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poitier-v-fimag-realty-corp-ny-1982.