Poitier v. Fimag Realty Corp.
445 N.E.2d 208, 58 N.Y.2d 748, 459 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3948
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness of the motion as required by rule 500.9 (a) (1) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.9 [c] [1]) (see Manolakos v Manolakos, 56 NY2d 591).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Poitier v. Fimag Realty Corp., 445 N.E.2d 208, 58 N.Y.2d 748, 459 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3948 (N.Y. 1982).
445 N.E.2d 208 (Poitier v. Fimag Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manolakos v. Manolakos
435 N.E.2d 678 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)