Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital

S.D. New York

Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital

DecidedMarch 31, 2023

Docket1:23-cv-02344

StatusUnknown

This text of Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital (Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NELLA MANKO, Plaintiff, 23-CV-2344 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, ET AL., UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On July 11, 2013, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Manko v. Schlesinger, ECF 1:12-CV- 9059, 11 (S.D.N.Y. July 11, 2013). Plaintiff files this new pro se action, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the court.1 The Court therefore dismisses the action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the July 11, 2013, order. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

1 Although Plaintiff labeled the complaint, “Pro Se Filing – New Case – Fee Paid,” she submitted the complaint without the $402.00 in filing fees and without an application to proceed IFP. On March 30, 2023, the court received Plaintiff’s IFP application. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this action. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 31, 2023 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NELLA MANKO, Plaintiff, 23-CV-2344 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, ET AL., UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On July 11, 2013, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Manko v. Schlesinger, ECF 1:12-CV- 9059, 11 (S.D.N.Y. July 11, 2013). Plaintiff files this new pro se action, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the court.1 The Court therefore dismisses the action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the July 11, 2013, order. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

1 Although Plaintiff labeled the complaint, “Pro Se Filing – New Case – Fee Paid,” she submitted the complaint without the $402.00 in filing fees and without an application to proceed IFP. On March 30, 2023, the court received Plaintiff’s IFP application. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this action. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 31, 2023 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manko-v-lenox-hill-hospital-nysd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack