Manca, Inc. v. United States
45 Cust. Ct. 360
United States Customs Court·Decided November 9, 1960·No. No. 64841; protest 58/16331 (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the article in question, described on the invoice as “1 Rangefinder testing device,” is a metal testing device, that it has no optical component parts, and that the device enables the observer to check, for correct position, the rangefinder coupling of a photographic lens, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. United States v. J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. (30 C.C.P.A. 213, C.A.D. 235), followed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manca, Inc. v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 360 (cusc 1960).
45 Cust. Ct. 360 (Manca, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. J. E. Bernard & Co.
30 C.C.P.A. 213 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1943)