Manca, Inc. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 464
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Manca, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Cust. Ct. 271
United States Customs Court·Decided February 28, 1958·No. No. 61601; protest 288440-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of magnifiers or as magnifiers, the items in question were held dutiable as claimed, as follows: The items marked “A” at 30 percent under the provision in paragraph 228 (b), as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 53877), for parts of microscopes and (2) the items marked “B” at 25 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified, supra, for microscopes, not specially provided for, valued at under $25 each.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manca, Inc. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 464 (cusc 1958).

40 Cust. Ct. 464 (Manca, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.