Manca, Inc. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 532
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Manca, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Cust. Ct. 271
United States Customs Court·Decided December 11, 1957·No. V. D. 56; Entry No. 965679·Published

Opinion

Wilson, Judge:

This matter is presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division in [533]*533Manca, Inc. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 227, Abstract 59247. The judgment entered therein stated: “* * * that the matter be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)

The matter has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values were as follows:

Merchandise United States dollars per each
1 microscope_ $400. 56
Wooden container to fit_ 13. 44

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

Insofar as the matter relates to all other merchandise, it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manca, Inc. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 532 (cusc 1957).

39 Cust. Ct. 532 (Manca, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manca, Inc. v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 227 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)