Malony v. Brady

18 N.Y.S. 757, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 864
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided May 2, 1892·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As the party ultimately answerable for the wrong, defendant is bound to indemnify plaintiff. Sulzbacher v. Dickie, 6 Daly, 469, is an explicit authority in support of defendant’s liability. Moreover, on a former appeal in this case, we adjudged the defendant liable upon a state of facts substantially identical with that established on the trial under review. Malony v. Brady, 14 N. Y. Supp. 794. In this court, at all events, the question is concluded. We may adS„ however, that the defendant’s guaranty afforded another and independent ground of recovery. The sum paid by plaintiff to repair the effects of defendant’s negligence, unless it were excessive, is t the proper measure of the damages for which he was responsible. The cases i cited by the appellant are not at all to the contrary. We perceive no error in, the return, and accordingly the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malony v. Brady, 18 N.Y.S. 757, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 864 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

18 N.Y.S. 757 (Malony v. Brady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anthony v. Moore & Munger Co.
135 A.D. 203 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Eberson v. Continental Investment Co.
109 S.W. 62 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1908)
Munk v. Maryland Casualty Co.
116 A.D. 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Malony v. Brady
19 N.Y.S. 911 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1892)