MALDONADO v. NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION

S.D. New York

MALDONADO v. NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION

DecidedJune 10, 2022

Docket1:22-cv-04839

StatusUnknown

This text of MALDONADO v. NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION (MALDONADO v. NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MALDONADO v. NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SAMUEL MALDONADO, Petitioner, 22-CV-4839 (LTS) -against- ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY OR IFP APPLICATION SUPERVISION, Respondent. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Petitioner, who is proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus. To proceed with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this court, a petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or, to request authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Petitioner submitted the petition without the filing fee or an IFP application.1 Within thirty days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or complete and submit the attached IFP application. If Petitioner submits the IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 22-CV-4839 (LTS). If the Court grants the IFP application, Petitioner will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). No answer shall be required at this time. If Petitioner complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Petitioner fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.

1 Petitioner filed this petition in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. In the order transferring the matter here, that court noted that Petitioner did not pay the fee or submit an IFP application. See Maldonado v. New York State Parole Community Supervision , No. 22-CV-162 (S.D. Fla. June 6, 2022). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED. Dated: June 10, 2022 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SAMUEL MALDONADO, Petitioner, 22-CV-4839 (LTS) -against- ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY OR IFP APPLICATION SUPERVISION, Respondent. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Petitioner, who is proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus. To proceed with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this court, a petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or, to request authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Petitioner submitted the petition without the filing fee or an IFP application.1 Within thirty days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or complete and submit the attached IFP application. If Petitioner submits the IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 22-CV-4839 (LTS). If the Court grants the IFP application, Petitioner will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). No answer shall be required at this time. If Petitioner complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Petitioner fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.

1 Petitioner filed this petition in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. In the order transferring the matter here, that court noted that Petitioner did not pay the fee or submit an IFP application. See Maldonado v. New York State Parole Community Supervision , No. 22-CV-162 (S.D. Fla. June 6, 2022). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED. Dated: June 10, 2022 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

MALDONADO v. NEW YORK STATE PAROLE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maldonado-v-new-york-state-parole-community-supervision-nysd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack