Maldonado v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maldonado v. Goord

296 A.D.2d 807, 745 N.Y.S.2d 498, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7599

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 25, 2002·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting the possession of cannabinoids, interference with an employee, harassment, making a false statement, refusing to obey a direct order and refusing to submit to a search or frisk. The determination has now been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional records. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912).

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting the possession of cannabinoids, interference with an employee, harassment, making a false statement, refusing to obey a direct order and refusing to submit to a search or frisk. The determination has now been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional records. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912).

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Maldonado v. Goord, 296 A.D.2d 807, 745 N.Y.S.2d 498, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7599 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

296 A.D.2d 807 (Maldonado v. Goord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related