Maldonado v. Goord
This text of 296 A.D.2d 807 (Maldonado v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting the possession of cannabinoids, interference with an employee, harassment, making a false statement, refusing to obey a direct order and refusing to submit to a search or frisk. The determination has now been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional records. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912).
Crew III, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
296 A.D.2d 807, 745 N.Y.S.2d 498, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maldonado-v-goord-nyappdiv-2002.