Medina v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Medina v. Senkowski

309 A.D.2d 1122, 766 N.Y.S.2d 915, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11240

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 309 A.D.2d 1122 (Medina v. Senkowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Medina v. Senkowski, 309 A.D.2d 1122, 766 N.Y.S.2d 915, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11240 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of creating a disturbance, making threats and a movement violation. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references to the proceeding have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Maldonado v Goord, 296 AD2d 807 [2002]).

Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of creating a disturbance, making threats and a movement violation. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references to the proceeding have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Maldonado v Goord, 296 AD2d 807 [2002]).

Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 A.D.2d 1122, 766 N.Y.S.2d 915, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medina-v-senkowski-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack