Morrison v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morrison v. Goord

19 A.D.3d 918, 796 N.Y.S.2d 925, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7109

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.3d 918 (Morrison v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morrison v. Goord, 19 A.D.3d 918, 796 N.Y.S.2d 925, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7109 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit inmates from committing an unhygienic act, refusing a direct order, failing to comply with frisk procedures and drug use. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Maldonado v Goord, 296 AD2d 807 [2002]).

Spain, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit inmates from committing an unhygienic act, refusing a direct order, failing to comply with frisk procedures and drug use. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Maldonado v Goord, 296 AD2d 807 [2002]).

Spain, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.3d 918, 796 N.Y.S.2d 925, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-goord-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack