Maixner v. Commissioner

33 T.C. 191, 1959 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 48
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedOctober 30, 1959
DocketDocket Nos. 70882, 70883
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 33 T.C. 191 (Maixner v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maixner v. Commissioner, 33 T.C. 191, 1959 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 48 (tax 1959).

Opinion

Fisher, Judge:

These proceedings were consolidated on the basis of agreement of counsel. They involve deficiencies in income tax determined by respondent for the taxable years 1954 and 1955 as follows:

[[Image here]]

The principal issues presented are (1) whether certain agreements between petitioners and the highway department of the State of Minnesota were obtained as a result of threats of condemnation and effected an involuntary conversion of earth materials removed from petitioners’ properties within the meaning of section 1231, and (2) whether petitioner Kubicek is to be limited to a standard deduction not in excess of $500 for the taxable year 1955. (Note: In view of our conclusion, infra, that the agreements were obtained as a result of threats of condemnation, it is unnecessary for us to consider whether said agreements constituted sales of earth materials or leases under either section 1221 or 1231 of the Code of 1954.)

FINDINGS OF FACT.

Some of the facts are stipulated, and are incorporated herein by reference.

Frank O. and Louise M. Maixner (petitioners in Docket No. 70882) were husband and wife and resided at Route 2, Owatonna, Steele County, Minnesota, during the taxable years 1954 and 1955. They filed a joint Federal income tax return (Form 1040) for each of the years 1954 and 1955 with the district director of internal revenue for the district of Minnesota.

On April 22, 1954, petitioners Maixner executed an instrument entitled “Agreement for Taking of Earth Materials.” This instrument, which was also executed by E. J. Rowland of the Department of Highways, State of Minnesota, provides, in part, as follows:

STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OE HIGHWAYS
AGREEMENT FOR TAKING OF EARTH MATERIALS
* * * * * * *
Name Frank O. Maixner (Louise) Address Route #2, Owatonna, Minnesota We hereby certify that we are the owners of the property described herein and have the power to give the rights hereinafter granted, and for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and further payments herein specified do_hereby grant unto the State of Minnesota, or its nominee the right to enter upon that portion of_ the south half of the southeast quarter (S%SEij) of Section 29, Twp. 106 N. Range 20 W., County of Steele, Minnesota, described as follows, to-wit:
That part of the north half of the above described tract lying west of the Straight River, except the west 500 feet thereof;
(The State shall have the exclusive right to remove materials from the above premises and no materials shall be removed by others without written permission from the Commissioner of Highways).
for the purpose of removing and to remove therefrom earth, gravel and any or all materials required for the use in the improvement, repair and maintenance of Trunk Highways for a period of 2 years from the date hereof_. The State shall also, under this agreement, be allowed to enter upon the above described lands for the purpose of investigation and tests of any material located thereon.
The State shall have the right of ingress to and egress from the hereinbefore described property and the owners hereby releases the State from all claims for damages by virtue of the reasonable use, according to the terms of this agreement, of said property.
Necessary stripping to be done by and at tbe expense of the State. Waste material to be placed between the east edge of the pit and the river and leveled off.
Payments for materials taken under this agreement shall be on the basis of records kept by the Commissioner of Highways, or his agent, and shall be made by the State, or its nominee, in the following manner :
At the rate of 14 cents per cubic yard of sand or gravel payable quarterly.
At the rate of _cents per cubic yard of_ payable quarterly.
At the rate of 10 cents per ton of sand or gravel payable quarterly.

Under tlie provisions of the instrument entitled “Agreement for Taking of Earth Materials,” the Department of Highways, State of Minnesota, removed approximately 180,000 tons of sand and gravel from land described in the said instrument. Pursuant to the terms of this instrument, the Maixners received $10,066.10 during the year 1954 and $7,925.70 during the year 1955.

The property described in the above-mentioned instrument covered 12 acres of an 80-acre farm located in Steele County, Minnesota. This farm was owned during the years involved herein by the Maixners and was cultivated by tenants of the said petitioners under a share-crop arrangement.

The aforesaid 180,000 tons of sand and gravel were removed from approximately 7 acres of the 12-acre tract described in the above-mentioned instrument. As a result of. the removal of such sand and gravel, the 7-acre tract could not be used for raising crops as it was thereafter covered with water.

The Maixners were unaware of the gravel deposits on their property prior to being advised of such deposits on April 22, 1954, by R. C. Sandman, a road engineer, in the employ of Minnesota’s Department of Highways whose duties included supervision of purchase of materials for State highway purposes.

After advising the said petitioners of the gravel deposits, Sandman sought to acquire use of such deposits for Minnesota’s Department of Highways. The location of the Maixner gravel was in about the middle of the job and could be hauled both north and south.

The Maixners refused at first to execute an agreement which would permit removal of gravel from their property.

The Maixners and Sandman negotiated with respect to terms and payment for any gravel removed. Sandman advised the Maixners that if they would not agree to the terms of his offer he would have the gravel deposits condemned. As a result of these discussions, the Maixners, on April 22,1954, executed the instrument entitled “Agreement for Taking of Earth Materials.”

Clement Kubicek (petitioner in Docket No. 70883 and hereinafter referred to as Kubicek) resided at Blooming Prairie, Steele County, Minnesota, during the taxable year 1955. He filed a separate Federal income tax return (Form 1040) for the taxable year 1955 with the district director of internal revenue for the district of Minnesota.

During the taxable years involved herein Kubicek owned and operated a 40-acre farm and blacksmith shop in Blooming Prairie, Steele County, Minnesota.

Prior to November 4,1953, the aforementioned Sandman contacted Kubicek on several occasions in an effort to get Kubicek to enter into an agreement allowing the Minnesota State highways department to remove gravel from Kubicek’s farm. Kubicek did not want to enter into such an agreement or sell gravel to the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Commissioner
1998 T.C. Memo. 448 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)
Ila I. Gail v. United States
58 F.3d 580 (Tenth Circuit, 1995)
Hay v. Commissioner
1992 T.C. Memo. 409 (U.S. Tax Court, 1992)
Tecumseh Corrugated Box Co. v. Commissioner
94 T.C. No. 22 (U.S. Tax Court, 1990)
Balistrieri v. Commissioner
1979 T.C. Memo. 115 (U.S. Tax Court, 1979)
Rainier Cos. v. Commissioner
61 T.C. No. 8 (U.S. Tax Court, 1973)
Warner v. Commissioner
56 T.C. 1126 (U.S. Tax Court, 1971)
Murray v. Comm'r
1965 T.C. Memo. 148 (U.S. Tax Court, 1965)
Dominguez Estate Co. v. Commissioner
1963 T.C. Memo. 112 (U.S. Tax Court, 1963)
Carson Estate Co. v. Commissioner
1963 T.C. Memo. 90 (U.S. Tax Court, 1963)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Clement Kubicek
289 F.2d 936 (Eighth Circuit, 1961)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Frank O. Maixner
289 F.2d 937 (Eighth Circuit, 1961)
Commissioner v. Kubicek
289 F.2d 936 (Eighth Circuit, 1961)
Commissioner v. Maixner
289 F.2d 937 (Eighth Circuit, 1961)
Maixner v. Commissioner
33 T.C. 191 (U.S. Tax Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 T.C. 191, 1959 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maixner-v-commissioner-tax-1959.