Mahaffey v. State
This text of 83 S.E. 795 (Mahaffey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where a misdemeanor was tried in a city court, and from the judgment therein a certiorari was taken to the superior court, and, upon the overruling of the certiorari, the defendant excepted, the hill of exceptions should have been served upon the solicitor-general of the cir[484]*484cuit, instead of upon the solicitor of the city court. It appearing in this case that the solicitor-general was not so served, and did not acknowledge or waive service, the writ of error must be dismissed. McColers v. State, 74 Ga. 411; Butts v. State, 90 Ga. 450 (16 S. E. 96) ; Moore v. State, 96 Ga. 309 (22 S. E. 760) ; MeElhannon v. State, 112 Ga. 221 (37 S. E. 402) ; Culbreth v. State, 115 Ga. 242 (41 S. E. 594) ; Glenn v. State, and Gilbert v. State, 122 Ga. 593 (50 S. E. 371) ; McDonald v. Town of Ludowici, 3 Ga. App. 656 (60 S. E. 337).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 S.E. 795, 15 Ga. App. 483, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahaffey-v-state-gactapp-1914.