Mahaffey v. State

83 S.E. 795, 15 Ga. App. 483, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 303
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 22, 1914·No. 6027·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Broyles, J.

Where a misdemeanor was tried in a city court, and from the judgment therein a certiorari was taken to the superior court, and, upon the overruling of the certiorari, the defendant excepted, the hill of exceptions should have been served upon the solicitor-general of the cir[484] cuit, instead of upon the solicitor of the city court. It appearing in this case that the solicitor-general was not so served, and did not acknowledge or waive service, the writ of error must be dismissed. McColers v. State, 74 Ga. 411; Butts v. State, 90 Ga. 450 (16 S. E. 96) ; Moore v. State, 96 Ga. 309 (22 S. E. 760) ; MeElhannon v. State, 112 Ga. 221 (37 S. E. 402) ; Culbreth v. State, 115 Ga. 242 (41 S. E. 594) ; Glenn v. State, and Gilbert v. State, 122 Ga. 593 (50 S. E. 371) ; McDonald v. Town of Ludowici, 3 Ga. App. 656 (60 S. E. 337).

Decided December 22, 1914. Certiorari; from Jackson superior court—Judge Brand. June 27, 1914. Thomas J. Shackelford, for plaintiff in error. P. Cooley, solicitor, contra.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahaffey v. State, 83 S.E. 795, 15 Ga. App. 483, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 303 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

83 S.E. 795 (Mahaffey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Welch v. State
84 S.E.2d 838 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Hudson v. State
94 S.E. 645 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)