Hudson v. State
This text of 94 S.E. 581 (Hudson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where a writ of certiorari to review errors alleged to have been committed in a criminal ease in a city court has been sanctioned, the solicitor-general of the circuit in which the city having such court is located must be given timely notice of the sanction of the writ and of the time and place of hearing. The burden is upon the petitioner to show that such notice has been given; and unless this burden is carried the certiorari should be dismissed. Moore v. State, 96 Ga. 309 (22 S. E. 960); McElhannon v. State, 112 Ga. 221 (37 S. E. [507]*507402); Culbreth v. State, 115 Ga. 242 (41 S. E. 594); Johnson v. State, 2 Ga. App. 181 (58 S. E. 415). It follows from this ruling that no error was committed in dismissing the certiorari in the instant case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 S.E. 581, 21 Ga. App. 506, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-state-gactapp-1917.