Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Culbreth v. State

Culbreth v. State

41 S.E. 594, 115 Ga. 242, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 371
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 24, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 41 S.E. 594 (Culbreth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Culbreth v. State, 41 S.E. 594, 115 Ga. 242, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 371 (Ga. 1902).

Opinion

Little, J.

Inasmuch as the solicitor-general is required by the constitution of this State to represent the State in all cases in the superior courts of his circuit, it follows that when a writ of certiorari has been sued out and sanctioned, to review the errors committed in a criminal case in a city court, the solicitor-general of the circuit in which the city having such court is located must be given notice of the sanction of such writ, because, after such sanction, the case is one pending in the superior court. McElhannon v. State, 112 Ga. 221, and cases cited. There was no error in dismissing the certiorari for the want of such notice.

Judgments affirmed.

All the Justices concumng, except Lewis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holliday v. State
93 S.E.2d 345 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Welch v. State
84 S.E.2d 838 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Washburn v. Thompson
50 S.E.2d 761 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Scott v. State
44 S.E.2d 391 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Hudson v. State
94 S.E. 581 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Mahaffey v. State
83 S.E. 795 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Glenn v. State
50 S.E. 371 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 S.E. 594, 115 Ga. 242, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/culbreth-v-state-ga-1902.