Madrid v. Miller
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSE ICU MADRID, Petitioner, 23-CV-11026 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL SUPT. MARK MILLER, Respondent. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated October 21, 2024, the Court granted Petitioner leave to file an amended petition within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the petition. Petitioner has not filed an amended petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state court remedies. Because the petition makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 22, 2025 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Madrid v. Miller (Madrid v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.