Mack v. State

42 S.E. 776, 116 Ga. 546, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 172
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 12, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 42 S.E. 776 (Mack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mack v. State, 42 S.E. 776, 116 Ga. 546, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 172 (Ga. 1902).

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. On the trial of one charged with having violated the law by illegally selling intoxicating liquor, proof that the accused received money from another person, accompanied with a request to procure whisky for the latter, and shortly thereafter delivered whisky to such person, puts the onus on the defendant of explaining where, how, and from whom he got the liquor (Grant v. State, 87 Ga. 265); and if the explanation offered by him is supported only by his own statement, the jury, if they believe it to be a mere subterfuge to cover up an illegal sale by himself, are authorized to find him guilty. White v. State, 93 Ga. 47.

2. There was no evidence whatever in the record to support the grounds of the motion for a new trial based upon alleged newly discovered evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent, and Candler, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Moore
233 P. 805 (California Court of Appeal, 1924)
Farmer v. State
88 S.E. 797 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Lane v. City of Millen
88 S.E. 748 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Hollingsworth v. State
88 S.E. 213 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Slaughter v. State
86 S.E. 741 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Touchstone v. State
86 S.E. 744 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
King v. City of Hazlehurst
85 S.E. 271 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Myers v. State
85 S.E. 206 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Cowart v. State
82 S.E. 313 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Howe v. State
73 S.E. 46 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Jones v. State
70 S.E. 192 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Huette v. State
128 N.W. 519 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1910)
State v. Turner
109 P. 983 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1910)
Irwin v. State
66 S.E. 807 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Bray v. City of Commerce
63 S.E. 596 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Shaw v. State
60 S.E. 326 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Gaskins v. State
55 S.E. 1045 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Burden v. State
47 S.E. 562 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Reese v. City of Newnan
47 S.E. 560 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 S.E. 776, 116 Ga. 546, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-v-state-ga-1902.