Grant v. State
13 S.E. 554, 87 Ga. 265, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 146
Opinion
In a prohibition county, a person who receives money from another with a request to procure whisky, and who shortly afterward delivers the whisky, may be treated as the seller if no other person filling that character appears, and if it is not shown where, how or from whom the whisky was obtained. This case is controlled in principle by Paschal v. The State, 84 Ga. 326.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grant v. State, 13 S.E. 554, 87 Ga. 265, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 146 (Ga. 1891).
13 S.E. 554 (Grant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
East v. State
120 S.E. 15 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Graham v. State
104 S.E. 248 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)
Farmer v. State
88 S.E. 797 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Lane v. City of Millen
88 S.E. 748 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Slaughter v. State
86 S.E. 741 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Touchstone v. State
86 S.E. 744 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
King v. City of Hazlehurst
85 S.E. 271 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Myers v. State
85 S.E. 206 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Cowart v. State
82 S.E. 313 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Irwin v. State
66 S.E. 807 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Bray v. City of Commerce
63 S.E. 596 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Barlow v. State
62 S.E. 574 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Shaw v. State
60 S.E. 326 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
State v. Kiger
61 S.E. 362 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1908)
Mack v. State
42 S.E. 776 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Billups v. State
33 S.E. 659 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Williams v. State
33 S.E. 641 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Cunningham v. State
31 S.E. 585 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Evans v. State
29 S.E. 40 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Jones v. State
28 S.E. 396 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)