Jones v. State

70 S.E. 192, 8 Ga. App. 849, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 171
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 15, 1911
Docket3134
StatusPublished

This text of 70 S.E. 192 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. State, 70 S.E. 192, 8 Ga. App. 849, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 171 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The only issue in the case made by the evidence and the statement of the accused was as to whether the latter, in the sale of the whisky, acted solely as agent for the buyer, or was himself the seller or in some way beneficially interested in the illegal transaction; and the law [850]*850applicable to the question has been repeatedly decided by this court and the Supreme Court. Highsmith v. Waycross, 7 Ga. App. 611 (67 S. E. 677), and cit.; Mach v. State, 116 Ga. 546 (42 S. E. 776), and eit.

Decided February 15, 1911. Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Waycross — 'Judge McDonald. October 22, 1910. J. J. Moore, for plaintiff in error. A. B. Spence, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mack v. State
42 S.E. 776 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Highsmith v. City of Waycross
67 S.E. 677 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 S.E. 192, 8 Ga. App. 849, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-gactapp-1911.