Jones v. State

70 S.E. 192, 8 Ga. App. 849, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 171
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Ga. App. 760
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 15, 1911·No. 3134·Published

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The only issue in the case made by the evidence and the statement of the accused was as to whether the latter, in the sale of the whisky, acted solely as agent for the buyer, or was himself the seller or in some way beneficially interested in the illegal transaction; and the law [850]*850applicable to the question has been repeatedly decided by this court and the Supreme Court. Highsmith v. Waycross, 7 Ga. App. 611 (67 S. E. 677), and cit.; Mach v. State, 116 Ga. 546 (42 S. E. 776), and eit.

Decided February 15, 1911. Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Waycross — 'Judge McDonald. October 22, 1910. J. J. Moore, for plaintiff in error. A. B. Spence, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 70 S.E. 192, 8 Ga. App. 849, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 171 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

70 S.E. 192 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mack v. State
42 S.E. 776 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Highsmith v. City of Waycross
67 S.E. 677 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)