Jones v. State
This text of 70 S.E. 192 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only issue in the case made by the evidence and the statement of the accused was as to whether the latter, in the sale of the whisky, acted solely as agent for the buyer, or was himself the seller or in some way beneficially interested in the illegal transaction; and the law [850]*850applicable to the question has been repeatedly decided by this court and the Supreme Court. Highsmith v. Waycross, 7 Ga. App. 611 (67 S. E. 677), and cit.; Mach v. State, 116 Ga. 546 (42 S. E. 776), and eit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 S.E. 192, 8 Ga. App. 849, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-gactapp-1911.