Macartney v. United States
41 Cust. Ct. 312
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Macartney v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Cust. Ct. 427 →
United States Customs Court·Decided June 27, 1958·No. No. 62136; protests 218790-K, etc. (Duluth)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the
merchandise consists of yellow cedar the same in all material respects as that the subject of Border Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States (39 Cust. Ct. 179, C. D. 1923), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Macartney v. United States, 41 Cust. Ct. 312 (cusc 1958).
41 Cust. Ct. 312 (Macartney v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Border Brokerage Co. v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 179 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)