Macartney v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Macartney v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 427

United States Customs Court·Decided November 21, 1956·No. No. 60381; protests 249301-K, etc. (Duluth)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ergoty screenings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Universal Laboratories v. United States (35 Cust. Ct. 23, C. D. 1715), the claim for free entry was sustained as to the percentages of ergot content of the merchandise, as set forth in the schedule “A,” attached to and made part of the decision. The remaining merchandise was held dutiable, as assessed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ergoty screenings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Universal Laboratories v. United States (35 Cust. Ct. 23, C. D. 1715), the claim for free entry was sustained as to the percentages of ergot content of the merchandise, as set forth in the schedule “A,” attached to and made part of the decision. The remaining merchandise was held dutiable, as assessed.

Macartney v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 427 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

37 Cust. Ct. 427 (Macartney v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related