Macartney v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Macartney v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 476

United States Customs Court·Decided April 17, 1957·No. No. 60670; protests 249294-K, 249295-K, and 249299-K (Duluth)·Published

Opinion

[477] Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ergoty screenings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Universal Laboratories v. United States (36 Cust. Ct. 23, C. D. 1716), the claim for free entry was sustained as to the percentages of ergot content of the merchandise, as set forth in the schedule “A,” attached to and made part of the decision. The remaining merchandise was held dutiable, as assessed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[477] Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ergoty screenings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Universal Laboratories v. United States (36 Cust. Ct. 23, C. D. 1716), the claim for free entry was sustained as to the percentages of ergot content of the merchandise, as set forth in the schedule “A,” attached to and made part of the decision. The remaining merchandise was held dutiable, as assessed.

Macartney v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 476 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

38 Cust. Ct. 476 (Macartney v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related