Macartney v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Macartney v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 476

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 17, 1957

DocketNo. 60670; protests 249294-K, 249295-K, and 249299-K (Duluth)

StatusPublished

This text of 38 Cust. Ct. 476 (Macartney v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Macartney v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 476 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

[477]*477Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ergoty screenings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Universal Laboratories v. United States (36 Cust. Ct. 23, C. D. 1716), the claim for free entry was sustained as to the percentages of ergot content of the merchandise, as set forth in the schedule “A,” attached to and made part of the decision. The remaining merchandise was held dutiable, as assessed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[477]*477Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ergoty screenings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Universal Laboratories v. United States (36 Cust. Ct. 23, C. D. 1716), the claim for free entry was sustained as to the percentages of ergot content of the merchandise, as set forth in the schedule “A,” attached to and made part of the decision. The remaining merchandise was held dutiable, as assessed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Cust. Ct. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macartney-v-united-states-cusc-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack