Mabel A. Akers v. Anthony J. Principi

17 Vet. App. 561, 2004 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 233, 2004 WL 928175
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided April 30, 2004·No. 01-710 (E)·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On September 26, 2003, in a single-judge order, the Court denied the appellant’s November 14, 2001, application for attorney fees and expenses filed pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). On October 16, 2003, the appellant filed a timely motion for a panel decision. On December 2, 2003, the Court denied the motion for a panel decision. On December 19, 2003, the appellant filed a timely motion for a full-Court decision. “Motions for a full-Court decision are not favored. Ordinarily they will not be granted unless such action is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions or to resolve a question of exceptional importance.” U.S. Vet.App. R. 35(c).

Upon consideration of the foregoing and the prior pleadings of the parties, it is

ORDERED that the motion for a full-Court decision is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mabel A. Akers v. Anthony J. Principi, 17 Vet. App. 561, 2004 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 233, 2004 WL 928175 (Cal. 2004).

17 Vet. App. 561 (Mabel A. Akers v. Anthony J. Principi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warren L. Johnson v. Anthony J. Principi
18 Vet. App. 503 (Veterans Claims, 2004)