Lutz v. Houck
292 U.S. 603, 54 S. Ct. 717
Opinion
The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U.S. 68, 71, 72; Budd v. New York, 143 U.S. 517, 548; Toyota v. Hawaii, 226 U.S. 184, 191, 192; Packard v. Banton, 264 U.S. 140, 143, 144; Radice v. New York, 264 U.S. 292, 296; Miller v. Wilson, 236 U.S. 373, 384; Price v. Illinois, 238 U.S. 446, 453; Silver v. Silver, 280 U.S. 117, 123, 124; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374, 396.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lutz v. Houck, 292 U.S. 603, 54 S. Ct. 717 (1934).
292 U.S. 603 (Lutz v. Houck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hayes v. Missouri
120 U.S. 68 (Supreme Court, 1887)
Budd v. New York
143 U.S. 517 (Supreme Court, 1892)
Toyota v. Territory of Hawaii
226 U.S. 184 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Miller v. Wilson
236 U.S. 373 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Price v. Illinois
238 U.S. 446 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Packard v. Banton
264 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Radice v. People of New York
264 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Silver v. Silver
280 U.S. 117 (Supreme Court, 1929)
Sproles v. Binford
286 U.S. 374 (Supreme Court, 1932)