Louis Shub v. Vivian v. Simpson, Secretary of State of Maryland

340 U.S. 861
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 27, 1950
Docket371; 372
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 340 U.S. 861 (Louis Shub v. Vivian v. Simpson, Secretary of State of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louis Shub v. Vivian v. Simpson, Secretary of State of Maryland, 340 U.S. 861 (1950).

Opinions

Reported below:-Md.-, 75 A. 2d 842.

No. 371 is a motion to advance and expedite the hearing of an appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeals of the State of Maryland affirming the denial of a petition for writ of mandamus.

Appellant, petitioner below, was nominated by the Progressive Party for Governor of Maryland at a convention held on August 7, 1950. On August 18, nine days before the last date permitted by law, he tendered a certificate of nomination to the Secretary of State, a prerequisite to appearing on the ballot for the election on November 7. On the same day, August 18, the tender was rejected for failure to file an affidavit required by the Maryland Subversive Activities Act of 1949, Md. Laws 1949, c. 96, § 1, par. 15. On September 14, petitioner obtained from the Circuit Court of Anne Arundel County an order to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not be issued to compel the Secretary of State to accept the certificate. The Secretary, on September 27, demurred to the petition; and on October 9, after a hearing, the court sustained the demurrer and dismissed the petition. On appeal to the Maryland Court of Appeals argument was heard on October 12. That court entered a per curiam order, two judges dissenting, the same day, affirming the judgment [862]*862against the petitioner and, obviously deeming an exposition of the statute necessary, stated that an opinion would thereafter be filed. On October 18 petitioner filed an appeal from this order. In this situation the motion to advance and expedite is denied.

No. 372 is a petition for writ of certiorari from the same order of the Court of Appeals insofar as it reversed the dismissal by the Circuit Court of the petition for writ of mandamus brought by a Progressive Party nominee for the United States House of Representatives. The petition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baggett v. Bullitt
215 F. Supp. 439 (W.D. Washington, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
340 U.S. 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-shub-v-vivian-v-simpson-secretary-of-state-of-maryland-scotus-1950.