Lavender v. Clark

329 U.S. 674, 91 L. Ed. 596, 67 S. Ct. 108, 1946 U.S. LEXIS 1880
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 21, 1946·No. No. 20·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinion

The motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Murphy, and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that leave to file should be granted and that a rule to show cause should issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lavender v. Clark, 329 U.S. 674, 91 L. Ed. 596, 67 S. Ct. 108, 1946 U.S. LEXIS 1880 (1946).

329 U.S. 674 (Lavender v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roland International Corp. v. Najjar
407 A.2d 1032 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1979)
Delozier v. Tyrone Area School Board
247 F. Supp. 30 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1965)
Sanders v. Gray
203 F. Supp. 158 (N.D. Georgia, 1962)
Brown v. State Election Board of the Oklahoma
1962 OK 36 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1962)
W. M. C. A., Inc. v. Simon
202 F. Supp. 741 (S.D. New York, 1962)
W.M.C.A. Inc. v. Simon
196 F. Supp. 758 (S.D. New York, 1961)
Baker v. Carr
179 F. Supp. 824 (M.D. Tennessee, 1959)
Dyer v. Kazuhisa Abe
138 F. Supp. 220 (D. Hawaii, 1956)
BOR. OF E. RUTHERFORD v. Sisselman
97 A.2d 431 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Yuba Consolidated Gold Fields v. Kilkeary
102 F. Supp. 999 (N.D. California, 1952)
South v. Peters
89 F. Supp. 672 (N.D. Georgia, 1950)